|
|
| Ecology and Behavior |
Antarctic fur seals are highly polygynous. Males arrive at the colonies in late October 23 weeks before the first females arrive and establish themselves on territories. Males continue to arrive and challenge for territories through much of the season. Territories are acquired and held with vocalizations, threat postures and fighting. In prime areas territories can be as small as 20 m2, and have up to19 females. The mean length of tenure for bulls at South Georgia is approximately 34 days. Male vocalizations include a bark or whimper, a guttural threat, a low-intensity threat, possibly a full threat, and a submissive call. Females growl and have a pup-attraction call that is a high-pitched wail.
Females begin to arrive in mid-November and most pupping and breeding occurs from late November to late December. They give birth 12 days after arrival at the colony, attend their pup for 67 days, come into estrous and mate, and then depart minutes to hours after mating for their first foraging trip. Foraging trip and attendance periods vary by year depending on the availability of the lactating females chief prey, adult krill, but are generally 45 days at sea followed by 23 days attendance on shore. Lactating females routinely dive from 830 m for less than 2 minutes, but have been recorded to depths of 181 m, and to undertake dives that have lasted 10 minutes. Mean dive depth and duration increase during the lactation period.
Pups are weaned in about 4 months. After they wean their pups, females disperse widely, possibly migrating north and are not seen at the colonies much until the next breeding season. Bulls also depart breeding areas, but subadults and adult males can be seen around the rookeries at South Georgia all year.
Like other southern fur seals, Antarctic fur seals porpoise when swimming rapidly. When rafting they often assume many of the typical fur seal resting posture. At other times, they can be found busily engaged in grooming. Predators include killer whales, leopard seals, and at Macquarie Island, New Zealand sea lions. Leopard seals have had a dramatic effect on several recolonized areas in the South Shetland Islands and have caused a decline at one site due to their extensive predation on pups. |
| Feeding and Prey |
The diet varies by season and location. Adult females at South Georgia feed heavily and selectively on adult krill. At Heard Island krill is not available and lactating females prey primarily on fish such as myctophids and mackerel icefish. In the winter, males and subadult males at South Georgia take krill and a variety of fish that eat krill, while squid and myctophids were only a small percentage of the diet. At Heard Island in the winter squid and myctophid fish dominate the diet. Foraging patterns of females in summer indicate nocturnal feeding.
Antarctic fur seals will eat penguins. Adult males have been documented chasing, killing and eating king penguins on land on Marion Island. They are also known to take macaroni and gentoo penguins in the water at Heard, Macquarie, and South Georgia Islands. |
| Threats and Status |
As was the case for all other southern fur seals, sealers drove the species to the brink of extinction by the late 19th century. The colony at South Georgia was thought to be as small as 100 animals in the 1930s. Today the population is estimated to exceed 3 million animals and is believed to be growing and expanding at a rapid rate with 95% of these using the colony at South Georgia.
The Antarctic Treaty and the Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals protect this fur seal below 60º S. Various efforts to launch commercial fisheries for krill near South Georgia have been unsuccessful. Trawling activities developing around Macquarie Island may effect the prey base of the primarily fish eating Antarctic fur seals that breed on those islands. No direct fisheries conflicts involving regular entanglements are known to exist. Antarctic fur seals become entangled in marine debris such as discarded fishing line, nets, packing bands and anything that can form a collar. It was estimated from and 198889 study that the numbers entangled might be as high as 1% of the total population with the majority of the impact on juvenile and subadults, particularly on males. In most cases the entangled debris was either causing injury, or was very tight and not expected to come off the animal, suggesting that most would eventually die as a result. |
| Links |
For current information on the conservation status of this species, please consult the following websites:
|
| References |
ARNOULD, J. P. Y. 2002. Southern fur seals Arctocephalus spp. Pp. 1146-1151 in W. F. Perrin, B. Wursig, and J. G. M. Thiewissen, eds. Encyclopedia of marine mammals. Academic Press.
BESTER, M. N., AND I. S. WILKINSON. 1989. Field identification of Antarctic and subantarctic fur seal pups. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 19(4):140-144.
BOVENG, P. L., L. M. HIRUKI, M. K. SCHWARZ, AND J. L. BENGTSON. 1998. Population growth of Antarctic fur seals: limitation by a top predator, the leopard seal? Ecology 79(8):2863-2877.
CROXALL, J. P., S. RODWELL, I. L. BOYD. 1990. Entanglement in man-made debris of Antarctic fur seals at Bird Island, South Georgia. Marine Mammal Science 6(3):221-233.
GUINET, C., P. JOUVENTIN, AND J-Y. GEORGES. 1994. Long term population changes of fur seals Arctocephalus gazella and Arctocephalus tropicalis on subantarctic (Crozet) and subtropical (St. Paul and Amsterdam) Islands and their possible relationship to El Nino Southern Oscillation. Antarctic Science 6(4):473-478.
HOFMEYR, G. J. G., AND M. N. BESTER. 1993. Predation on king penguins by Antarctic fur seals. South African Journal of Antarctic Research 23(1 and 2):71-74. |
| Species Illustrations |

Image credit: NOAA NMML, Lisa Hiruki |
| Relevant OBIS-SEAMAP Datasets (# sets:
0) |
|